Religion takes advantage of this feeling of eternal significance, giving it a specific vocabulary, but from Freud's perspective the oceanic feeling does not actually come from religion.ĭiscuss Freud's notion of happiness. However, the primal memory of this oneness with the world remains. Originally, Freud proposes, a child does not understand the difference between his own body - his ego - and the outer world. How does Freud explain, in psycho-analytic terms, the "oceanic" feeling that figures so prominently in organized religion? Does he consider this feeling to be a result of religion, or some prior experience?įreud considers the oceanic feeling of eternity to be the vestige of a young child's experience of total oneness with the world. Violent behavior predates property, he says, and will likely be a part of the human portion for all time. Communism argues that human aggression and oppression are the result of private property Freud, on the contrary, argues that human aggressive impulses are more deeply-seated than that. Rather, Freud takes issue with the theory of humanity implicit in communist thought. Where does Freud agree with communist insights? Where does he disagree?įreud's primary criticism of communism does not concern its interest in abolishing private property on the contrary, he expresses sympathy for the poverty-stricken and offers no opinion on the value of communal ownership of property. Consider Freud's critique of communist thought.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |